4.6 Article

Isomerization of Functionalized Olefins by Using the Dinuclear Catalyst [PdI(μ-Br)(PtBu3)]2: A Mechanistic Study

期刊

CHEMISTRY-A EUROPEAN JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 61, 页码 15226-15238

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202102554

关键词

density-functional theory; isomerization; palladium; reaction mechanisms; stereoselectivity

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC-2033-390677874-RESOLV, SFB TRR88]
  2. bilateral DST-DFG scheme [INT/FRG/DFG/P-05/2017/GO 853/12-1]
  3. UGC, India
  4. Fonds der chemischen Industrie
  5. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, it was found that a significant amount of products are formed via the dinuclear pathway during isomerization of allyl arenes, esters, amides, ethers, and alcohols. The dissociation barrier towards mononuclear Pd species is relatively high, and once the catalyst enters the energetically more favorable mononuclear pathway, only a low barrier has to be overcome towards irreversible deactivation.
In a combined experimental and computational study, the isomerization activity of the dinuclear palladium(I) complex [Pd-I(mu-Br)((PBu3)-Bu-t)](2) towards allyl arenes, esters, amides, ethers, and alcohols has been investigated. The calculated energy profiles for catalyst activation for two alternative dinuclear and mononuclear catalytic cycles, and for catalyst deactivation are in good agreement with the experimental results. Comparison of experimentally observed E/Z ratios at incomplete conversion with calculated kinetic selectivities revealed that a substantial amount of product must form via the dinuclear pathway, in which the isomerization is promoted cooperatively by two palladium centers. The dissociation barrier towards mononuclear Pd species is relatively high, and once the catalyst enters the energetically more favorable mononuclear pathway, only a low barrier has to be overcome towards irreversible deactivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据