4.8 Review

Medicinal Chemistry of Isocyanides

期刊

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
卷 121, 期 17, 页码 10742-10788

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00143

关键词

-

资金

  1. Universita del Piemonte Orientale, Novara
  2. Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isocyanides, with their metal coordinating properties, have carved out a niche in ecological systems through evolution. Despite their potential biological activity, medicinal chemists have been skeptical of isocyanides due to concerns about reactivity and stability. This review aims to showcase the rich biological activity of isocyanide-containing molecules and advocate for their consideration in future drug design.
In eons of evolution, isocyanides carved out a niche in the ecological systems probably thanks to their metal coordinating properties. In 1859 the first isocyanide was synthesized by humans and in 1950 the first natural isocyanide was discovered. Now, at the beginning of XXI century, hundreds of isocyanides have been isolated both in prokaryotes and eukaryotes and thousands have been synthesized in the laboratory. For some of them their ecological role is known, and their potent biological activity as antibacterial, antifungal, antimalarial, antifouling, and antitumoral compounds has been described. Notwithstanding, the isocyanides have not gained a good reputation among medicinal chemists who have erroneously considered them either too reactive or metabolically unstable, and this has restricted their main use to technical applications as ligands in coordination chemistry. The aim of this review is therefore to show the richness in biological activity of the isocyanide-containing molecules, to support the idea of using the isocyanide functional group as an unconventional pharmacophore especially useful as a metal coordinating warhead. The unhidden hope is to convince the skeptical medicinal chemists of the isocyanide potential in many areas of drug discovery and considering them in the design of future drugs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据