4.6 Article

Sustainable preparation of graphene-like hybrid nanomaterials and their application for organic dyes removal

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116482

关键词

Graphene; Renewable precursors; Graphene-bentonite hybrid nanomaterial; Nanoindentation; Pollutants removal

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada
  2. Quebec Centre for Advanced Materials (QCAM/CQMF) from Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene-like hybrid nanomaterials (GHNs) were successfully synthesized using sustainable and solvent-free method, with sucrose and bentonite renewable precursors. The characterization techniques confirmed the successful transformation of sucrose to sp2-hybridized carbon, and the hybrid nanomaterials showed potential for removing water pollutants.
Graphene-like hybrid nanomaterials (GHNs) were successfully synthesized through a sustainable and solvent-free method. Sucrose and bentonite renewable precursors were used as a carbon source and a template, respectively. The characterization of GHN by Raman nanoscale spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed the successful transformation of sucrose to sp2-hybridized carbon as in graphene. The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM) analysis evidenced the formation of a hybrid nanomaterial in a well-defined layered structure. The nanoindentation studies show that the modulus of the pyrolyzed sugar was 4 GPa, while it was 28 GPa for the graphene layer synthetized with this procedure. These hybrid nanomaterials were evaluated as an adsorbent for the removal of both cationic (rhodamine B and methylene blue dyes) and anionic (methyl orange) organic water pollutants at 9.5-10 mg/g. These stiffer GHN increase the resilience, durability, and sustainability of the clay particles for treatment processes. Crown Copyright (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据