4.6 Article

Orbital-scale understanding on high-selective hydrogenation of acetylene over Pt1-Cu(111) catalyst

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 240, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2021.116664

关键词

Single-atom alloys catalyst; Ethylene adsorption; Acetylene hydrogenation; High selectivity; Orbital-scale understanding

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018JBZ107, 2019RC035]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91961125, 21905019]
  3. Key Program for International S&T Cooperation Projects of China from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2018YFE0124600]
  4. Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Guangdong Laboratory [1932001, 1932004]
  5. Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province [2020B0101370001]
  6. China Petrochemical Corporation [S20L00151]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding acetylene hydrogenation process at orbital scale using Pt-1-Cu(1 1 1) and Pd-1-Cu(1 1 1) model catalysts can provide insights for catalyst design and pave the way for general catalysis.
Acetylene hydrogenation is one of the essential industrial catalytic reactions. Revealing the insight of acetylene hydrogenation process, especially at orbital scale, is particularly crucial for the development of high-efficient catalysts. Here, we reported on the orbital-scale understanding of acetylene hydrogenation, utilizing Pt-1-Cu(1 1 1) and Pd-1-Cu(1 1 1) as model catalysts. The calculated results demonstrate that Pt-1-Cu(1 1 1) delivers high-selectivity and durability for acetylene hydrogenation, in which Pt-d(xz) and C2H4-pi(z)* orbital coupling holds the dominated role. Moreover, the orbital-scale understanding is applicable for extensive catalysts in acetylene hydrogenation. Thus, this work provides insights into acetylene hydrogenation precisely at orbital scale and may pave the way for the orbital catalyst design towards general catalysis. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据