4.7 Article

Localizing concentrated electrolyte in pore geometry for highly reversible aqueous Zn metal batteries

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 420, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129642

关键词

Rechargeable aqueous batteries; Zn metal anode; Nanoporous structure; Locally concentrated electrolyte; Electrochemical reversibility

资金

  1. Innovation Fund of Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics of Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M640694, 2020T130223]
  3. Analytical and Testing Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By accurately controlling the nanopore structure, the aqueous Zn metal electrode can achieve high electrochemical reversibility, showing long-term cycling stability and high Coulombic efficiency, which is more stable than the untreated zinc anode.
Rechargeable aqueous Zn metal batteries are promising for large-scale renewable energy storage. However, the aqueous Zn metal battery chemistry encounters severe irreversibility issues, as manifested by the non-uniform metallic Zn plating and undesired side-reactions of corrosion. Herein, we report a highly-reversible aqueous Zn metal anode with accurately controlled nanopore structure, by which the space charge distribution could be regulated and interface-localized concentrated electrolyte was enabled. Consequently, the nanoporous Zn (npZn) electrode exhibited high electrochemical reversibility for 750 h under the measurement with a combination of electrochemically Zn stripping/plating cycling (1 mA cm-2 and 1 mAh cm-2 for 25 cycles) and resting (50 h), and looping. Moreover, a npZn||NaVO3 cell exhibited a high capacity of 200 mAh g-1 and a long lifespan with considerable capacity retention (76% for 1500 cycles), and high reversibility (Coulombic efficiency of 99.8%), which was more stable than the counterpart with pristine Zn anode (short-circuit after 600 cycles).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据