4.7 Article

Bio-adhesive catechol-modified chitosan wound healing hydrogel dressings through glow discharge plasma technique

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 427, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.130843

关键词

Discharge plasma; Adhesive; Antioxidant; Antibacterial; Wound healing

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2020YFA0710700, 2018YFA0208900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81673016, 81773653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully prepared CS-GA hydrogels with excellent antioxidant properties and confirmed their ability to form cross-linked hydrogels under physiological conditions, as well as their potential applications in wound healing and hemostasis.
For clinical traumas and surgeries, adhesives that can be used in humid environments is considerably challenging. Inspired by the adhesive proteins of mussel, a gallic acid-modified chitosan-based (CS-GA) hydrogel was prepared through discharge plasma technology, which was first reported to realise polysaccharidemacromolecule-grafted phenolic acids. CS-GA hydrogels with different grafting amounts were successfully prepared, and their structures were characterised using ultraviolet, 1H nuclear magnetic resonance and Fouriertransform infrared spectroscopy. The modified material exhibited excellent antioxidant properties, which were verified using classical DPPH radical scavenging and reducibility experiments. CS-GA was oxidised in air under physiological conditions and cross-linked to form a hydrogel, with unusual toughness and adhesion properties. The high biocompatibility and haemocompatibility of this hydrogel were showed through cytotoxicity and haemolysis experiments. Furthermore, the abilities of the hydrogel to promote wound healing and haemostasis were evaluated using in vivo rat whole layer skin defect and liver haemorrhage models, respectively. These abilities can provide many possibilities for the development of multifunctional biomedical adhesives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据