4.7 Article

Novel antimony phosphate loaded on grid-like N, S-doped carbon for facilitating sodium-ion storage

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 415, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128942

关键词

SbPO4; Polyimide; Hard carbon; Sodium ion batteries

资金

  1. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011615]
  2. Project of the Department of Education of Guangdong Province [2018KTSCX047]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [2019050001]
  4. Challenge Cup Gold Seed Cultivation Project of South China Normal University [20WDKC01]
  5. Graduate Student Innovation Program of South China Normal University [2019LKXM039]
  6. Scientific and Technological Plan of Guangdong Province, China [2019B090905005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The SbPO4/NTC composite, utilized as an anode material for sodium ion batteries, exhibits remarkable electrochemical performance with high discharge capacity and notable rate capability. Furthermore, it shows favorable capacity in a wide operating temperature range, indicating great potential for efficient sodium ion storage.
The mesh-like hard carbon loaded SbPO4 (SbPO4/NTC) was harvested and employed as anode material for sodium ion batteries. Profiting from prominent capacitance, porous structure, and sufficient buffering space, the composite realizes high electrochemical kinetics for sodium ion storage. The SbPO4/NTC composite gains impressive battery properties, such as high discharge capacity of 413.7 mAh g(-1) under 0.5 A g(-1) after 200 cycles and conspicuous rate performance of 365.7 mAh g(-1) even at 6 A g(-1). In addition, the composite demonstrates a wide operation-temperature window with favorable capacities of 194.3-397.6 mAh g(-1) from -10 degrees C to 60 degrees C at 0.1 A g(-1). The phase transition and sodium storage mechanism are elucidated by density functional theory (DFT) calculation. Therefore, the SbPO4/NTC composite has a great potential for high-efficient sodium ion storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据