4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Keywords: Liquid-Liquid Extraction Interfaces Enrichment Density Gradient Theory Koningsveld-Kleintjens

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2021.108501

关键词

Liquid-Liquid Extraction; Interfaces; Enrichment; Density Gradient Theory; Koningsveld-Kleintjens

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interfacial properties, such as interfacial mass transfer, play a crucial role in the design and optimization of industrial separation processes. This study investigates the interfacial behavior of two quaternary systems and the relationship between interfacial enrichment and mass transfer. By combining the Concentration Gradient Theory (CGT) with the Koningsveld-Kleintjens (KK) model, the interfacial tension and interfacial concentration profiles are calculated. The results show that interfacial mass transfer in quaternary systems can be accurately modeled by adjusting a single additional binary mobility coefficient, and indicate a potential link between interfacial enrichment and interfacial mass transfer.
Interfacial properties such as interfacial mass transfer are essential for the design and optimization of industrial separation processes. In this work we investigate the interfacial behavior of the two quaternary systems water + toluene + ethanol + acetone and water + toluene + ethanol + tetrahydrofuran and the relation between interfacial enrichment and mass transfer. The Concentration Gradient Theory (CGT) is combined with the Koningsveld-Kleintjens (KK) model to calculate interfacial tension and interfacial concentration profiles. By expanding a recent study of ternary systems with ethanol, acetone or tetrahydrofuran as transferring components we demonstrate that interfacial mass transfer in quaternary systems can be modeled with CGT + KK in good accordance to experimental data by adjusting a single additional binary mobility coefficient. Moreover, the present study indicates a hint on a link between interfacial enrichment and interfacial mass transfer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据