4.4 Article

Analysis of Hydrocyclone Geometry via Rapid Optimization Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY
卷 44, 期 9, 页码 1693-1707

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ceat.202100121

关键词

Computational cost; Computational fluid dynamics; Hydrocyclone; Numerical simulation; Optimization

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [201908230337]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2018YFE0196000]
  3. Natural Science Foundation (Key Projects) of Heilongjiang Province, China [ZD2020E001]
  4. Supporting Project for Longjiang Scholars of Northeast Petroleum University, China [lj201803]
  5. United States Department of Energy (CERC-WET Project) [2.5]
  6. Water-Energy Nexus (WEX) Center of the University of California, Irvine USA
  7. Santa Margarita Water District

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrocyclones use density gradients for centrifugal separation of dispersions in liquid, with optimization usually based on computational fluid dynamics that has long computational times. A new rapid optimization method, DUOM, reduced computational time by 31.1% compared to the common SFOM method.
Hydrocyclones exploit density gradients for the centrifugal separation of dispersions in a continuous liquid. Selection of the geometrics for optimal separation is case specific, like the media characteristics. The existing optimization method based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides a powerful analytical tool but requires long computational times. The most common praxis for CFD optimization is via the single-factor optimization method (SFOM). In this study, a novel approach is presented as an improved rapid optimization method that implements a dynamic-mesh and user-defined function optimization method (DUOM). The DUOM adapts the dynamic-mesh approach from other applications to the optimization analysis of hydrocyclones. The DUOM reduced the computational time by 31.1 %, compared to the SFOM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据