4.7 Article

Synchronization in multiplex networks of chaotic oscillators with frequency mismatch

期刊

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.110882

关键词

Synchronization; Multiplex networks; Spatiotemporal patterns; Chimera; Frequency mismatch; Nonlocal coupling; Chaotic oscillator

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [20-12-00119]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [20-12-00119] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that inter-layer synchronization can occur even when there is a large frequency mismatch between the layers. There is a clear distinction between frequency synchronization and structure synchronization. The weakest chaotic behavior is observed when both frequency and structure synchronizations occur, while the most developed chaotic oscillations are typical when the spatiotemporal structures in the layers are not synchronized.
We explore numerically inter-layer synchronization of spatiotemporal patterns in a heterogeneous bilayer network of nonlocally coupled R & ouml;ssler oscillators. Both layers exhibit phase chimera regimes with similar cluster structures, but there is a mean frequency mismatch between the layers. We show that an entrainment of the mean frequency in the interacting layers is observed already for sufficiently weak inter-layer coupling even when the frequency mismatch is large. At the same time, frequency synchronization does not mean structure synchronization. Our numerical study indicates that inter-layer synchronization takes place within noticeably shorter ranges of the frequency mismatch and the inter-layer coupling strength than the frequency synchronization regime. Besides, we show that the weakest chaotic behavior is observed when both frequency and structure synchronizations occur, while the most developed chaotic oscillations are typical when the spatiotemporal structures in the layers are desynchronized. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据