4.7 Article

Morphology-controlled fabrication of nanostructured WO3 thin films by magnetron sputtering with glancing angle deposition for enhanced efficiency photo-electrochemical water splitting

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 47, 期 24, 页码 34455-34462

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.08.359

关键词

WO3; GLAD; Magnetron sputtering; PEC; Nanostructure

资金

  1. CAS-NSTDA Joint Research Projects [P2051921]
  2. National Electronics and Computer Technology Center (NECTEC), Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tungsten trioxide nanostructure thin films fabricated by MS-GLAD technique show enhanced PEC efficiency compared to single layer samples, with various morphologies available and detailed analysis on chemical composition and work function.
Herein, the tungsten trioxide (WO3) nanostructure thin films with different morphologies are firstly fabricated by magnetron sputtering with glancing angle deposition technique (MS-GLAD), followed by the post annealed treatment process in air ambient for 2 h. It is demonstrated that the geometry of MS-GLAD setup, mainly substrate position, played a crucial role in determining the morphology, crystallinity, optical transmittance, and photo-electrochemical (PEC) performance of the WO3 nanostructured thin film. With the different substrate positions in the MS-GLAD system, the WO3 nanorod film layer could be precisely changed to combine an underlying dense layer with a nanorod layer and then nanocolumnar film. Moreover, the prepared samples' chemical composition and work function are studied by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS), respectively. The combining WO3 nanostructure produced high PEC efficiency compared to the single layer of the WO3 nanorods sample and the dense WO3 thin film sample. Thus, morphology-controlled nanostructure film based on the MS-GLAD technique in our study provides a simple approach to enhance the photo-anode for PEC water splitting application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据