4.7 Article

Tensile damage evolution of 2D SiC(f)/BN(i)/(SiC-B4C)(m) composites based on acoustic emission pattern recognition

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 48, 期 1, 页码 64-73

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.081

关键词

SiC/SiC; Acoustic emission; Pattern recognition; Failure mechanism; Damage evolution

资金

  1. National Natural Sci-ence Foundation of China [51772244, 11072195]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tensile test of 2D SiC(f)/BN(i)/(SiC-B4C)((m)) was conducted with acoustic emission (AE) online monitoring to study mechanical properties and failure mechanisms. Pattern recognition technique was used to determine the relationship between AE signals and damage mechanisms, leading to the proposal of an improved sentry function. The loading process was found to consist of four stages with different damage mechanisms dominating each stage.
The tensile test of 2D SiC(f)/BN(i)/(SiC-B4C)((m)), with acoustic emission (AE) online monitoring, was carried out to study the mechanical properties and failure mechanism. Using the pattern recognition technique to find out the relationship between AE signals and damage mechanisms, an improved sentry function was proposed by choosing the AE energy of fiber breakage instead of the AE energy in its definition. Combined with the cumulative trend of each class of the AE signals, the damage evolution process was identified. It is found that the entire loading process includes four stages: (a) the linear elastic stage, there have sporadic AE events; (b) the initial damage stage, the matrix cracking contributes 80.4% of the AE energy and leads to the non-linear behavior of the stress-displacement curve; (c) the damage development stage, in which all types of damage continuously happen; and (d) the damage acceleration stage, dominated by fiber breakage that accounts for 60.1% of the AE energy. The improved sentry function has a decreasing trend during the fourth stage, which provides an early warning before failure, and gives a reliable ultimate strength.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据