4.7 Article

Use of kaolinite clays in development of a low carbon MgO-clay binder system

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106422

关键词

MgO; Kaolin clay; X-ray diffraction; Porosity; Hydrotalcite

资金

  1. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that magnesium oxide based cements can serve as a promising alternative to Portland cement, and can be produced using calcined kaolinitic clay. The MgO binder shows comparable or better compressive strength and significantly lower porosity compared to systems containing silica fume. The presence of magnesium carbonate further enhances the physical properties of the clay mixes.
Magnesium oxide based cements may provide a promising alternative to the conventional Portland cement in many applications. This study investigates the feasibility of using calcined kaolinitic clay to produce an MgO binder. The MgO-based binder were prepared using a low kaolinite content clay and metakaolin and were compared with a silica fume system. Implications of the addition of magnesium carbonate in the binder were also investigated. Isothermal calorimetry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) were used to study the hydration characteristics of the binder system whereas compressive strength and porosity were measured to determine mechanical and durability attributes. The economic and environmental aspects of the binder system is also discussed. Hydrotalcite like phases were clearly produced on hydration in the clay mixes containing carbonate additions. The compressive strength of clay mixes was at par or better compared to systems containing silica fume, and the clay systems had significantly lower porosity levels. The presence of magnesium carbonate further enhanced the physical properties of the clay mixes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据