4.7 Review

A review of the effect of nanoclays on the fresh and hardened properties of cement-based materials

期刊

CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106502

关键词

Nanoclay; Rheology; Hydration; Strength; Shrinkage

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1653419]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1653419] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an overview of the use of nanoclays in cement-based materials, discussing their impact on shear rheological properties and structural build-up behavior. It also examines the effects of nanoclays on fresh microstructures, providing insight into their flocculation and coagulation behavior. Additionally, it discusses secondary effects on hardened properties and presents examples of casting applications utilizing nanoclays as rheological modifiers.
This paper provides an overview of the use of nanoclays in cement-based materials. The effect of nanoclays on shear rheological properties will be discussed, with a focus on structural build-up behavior. This macroscale flow behavior will then be tied to the effect of nanoclays on the fresh microstructure as characterized via in-situ particle size measurements and rheological techniques. This will provide insight on the mechanisms underlying the effect of nanoclays on fresh state properties through an improved understanding of their effect on flocculation and coagulation behavior. In addition, secondary effects nanoclays have on the hardening and hardened properties will also be discussed. Examples of casting applications in which nanoclays have been effectively utilized as rheological modifiers, i.e. reducing self-consolidating concrete formwork pressure, extrusion, semi-flowable concrete for slipform paving, and 3D concrete printing, will be presented. Finally, some thoughts on potential directions for future work will be shared.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据