4.7 Article

Soft mechanical treatments of recycled fibers using a high-shear homogenizer for tissue and hygiene products

期刊

CELLULOSE
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 7981-7994

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04024-0

关键词

Sustainable tissue and towels; Refining; High shear homogenization; Softness; Strength; Absorbency

资金

  1. State of North Carolina
  2. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study introduces an innovative approach for developing high strength-high softness recycled fibers through soft mechanical treatment, achieving high softness and tensile strength by utilizing a homogenizer alone or in tandem with a refiner. The homogenized recycled fibers and tissue paper sheets provided higher bulk, water absorption, and tensile strength while maintaining the softness and drainage behavior similar to unrefined paper sheets. Homogenization helps in deflocculating the recycled fibers without negatively affecting the fiber quality, such as fines generation.
This study introduces an innovative approach for developing high strength-high softness recycled fibers through soft mechanical treatment. Recycled fibers from old corrugated containers were treated using a homogenizer, a refiner, and in tandem. The recycled fibers and tissue paper sheets after the treatments were evaluated for the effect on critical properties such as fiber morphologies, freeness, water retention, hard-to-remove water, bulk, softness, tensile strength, and water absorption. High softness and tensile strength were achieved with mechanical treatment by utilizing a homogenizer alone or in tandem with a refiner. Overall, the homogenized recycled fibers and tissue paper sheets provided higher bulk, water absorption, and tensile strength while maintaining the softness and drainage (freeness) behavior similar to unrefined paper sheets. It was found that homogenization helps in deflocculating the recycled fibers without negatively affecting the fiber quality, such as fines generation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据