4.6 Article

Subtype-dependent regulation of Gβγ signalling

期刊

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
卷 82, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2021.109947

关键词

GPCRs; Heterotrimeric G proteins; Translocation; Signalling; Signal Transduction; Subcellular localization; Evolution; Human Disease

资金

  1. NIH-NIGMS [1R15GM126455-01A1]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [PJT-159687]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G protein-coupled receptors transmit information to the cell interior through the diversity of Gα and Gβ subtypes, affecting downstream effector molecules. Studies have found preferences of distinct Gβγ combinations for specific GPCRs, Gα subtypes, and effector molecules.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transmit information to the cell interior by transducing external signals to heterotrimeric G protein subunits, G? and G?? subunits, localized on the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. Though the initial focus was mainly on G?-mediated events, G?? subunits were later identified as major contributors to GPCR-G protein signalling. A broad functional array of G?? signalling has recently been attributed to G? and G? subtype diversity, comprising 5 G? and 12 G? subtypes, respectively. In addition to displaying selectivity towards each other to form the G?? dimer, numerous studies have identified preferences of distinct G?? combinations for specific GPCRs, G? subtypes and effector molecules. Importantly, G? and G? subtypedependent regulation of downstream effectors, representing a diverse range of signalling pathways and physiological functions have been found. Here, we review the literature on the repercussions of G? and G? subtype diversity on direct and indirect regulation of GPCR/G protein signalling events and their physiological outcomes. Our discussion additionally provides perspective in understanding the intricacies underlying molecular regulation of subtype-specific roles of G?? signalling and associated diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据