4.4 Article

Fast PSP measurements of wall-pressure fluctuation in low-speed flows: improvements using proper orthogonal decomposition

期刊

EXPERIMENTS IN FLUIDS
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-016-2130-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [11502144]
  3. Gas Turbine Research Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fast pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) is very useful in flow diagnostics due to its fast response and high spatial resolution, but its applications in low-speed flows are usually challenging due to limitations of paint's pressure sensitivity and the capability of high-speed imagers. The poor signal-to-noise ratio in low-speed cases makes it very difficult to extract useful information from the PSP data. In this study, unsteady PSP measurements were made on a flat plate behind a cylinder in a low-speed wind tunnel (flow speed from 10 to 17 m/s). Pressure fluctuations (Delta P) on the plate caused by vortex-plate interaction were recorded continuously by fast PSP (using a highspeed camera) and a microphone array. Power spectrum of pressure fluctuations and phase-averaged Delta P obtained from PSP and microphone were compared, showing good agreement in general. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) was used to reduce noise in PSP data and extract the dominant pressure features. The PSP results reconstructed from selected POD modes were then compared to the pressure data obtained simultaneously with microphone sensors. Based on the comparison of both instantaneous Delta P and root-mean-square of Delta P, it was confirmed that POD analysis could effectively remove noise while preserving the instantaneous pressure information with good fidelity, especially for flows with strong periodicity. This technique extends the application range of fast PSP and can be a powerful tool for fundamental fluid mechanics research at low speed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据