4.7 Article

Global mapping of Salmonella enterica-host protein-protein interactions during infection

期刊

CELL HOST & MICROBE
卷 29, 期 8, 页码 1316-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.06.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. EMBL Interdisciplinary Postdoc (EIPOD) program
  2. DFG [GE 976/10-1]
  3. Intramural Research Program of the NIAID [ZIA AI000909]
  4. Helmholtz Society
  5. EMBL
  6. Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions COFUND [291772]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the mechanisms by which intracellular bacterial pathogens inject effector proteins to hijack host cellular processes, leading to the identification of multiple effector-host protein-protein interactions. The research revealed that different effectors target multiple host cellular processes and promote bacterial survival and proliferation through modulating host cellular pathways.
Intracellular bacterial pathogens inject effector proteins to hijack host cellular processes and promote their survival and proliferation. To systematically map effector-host protein-protein interactions (PPIs) during infection, we generated a library of 32 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (STm) strains expressing chromosomally encoded affinity-tagged effectors and quantified PPIs in macrophages and epithelial cells. We identified 446 effector-host PPIs, 25 of which were previously described, and validated 13 by reciprocal co-immunoprecipitation. While effectors converged on the same host cellular processes, most had multiple targets, which often differed between cell types. We demonstrate that SseJ, SseL, and SifA modulate cholesterol accumulation at the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV) partially via the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1 protein. PipB recruits the organelle contact site protein PDZD8 to the SCV, and SteC promotes actin bundling by phosphorylating formin-like proteins. This study provides a method for probing host-pathogen PPIs during infection and a resource for interrogating STm effector mechanisms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据