4.7 Article

TRIM26 positively regulates the inflammatory immune response through K11-linked ubiquitination of TAB1

期刊

CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 3077-3091

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41418-021-00803-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [81930039, 31730026, 81525012, 31900680]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [BX201700146]
  3. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018BC021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that TRIM26 positively regulates TAK1 activation by ubiquitinating its binding partner TAB1. Trim26 deficiency reduces the induction of inflammatory cytokines, protecting mice from septic shock and attenuating the severity of colitis.
Protein ubiquitination plays an important role in the regulation of TGF-beta-activated kinase 1 (TAK1)-mediated NF-kappa B activation. It is well established that TAK1 activation is tightly regulated with its binding partners, TAK1-binding proteins (TAB1-3). However, the tight regulation of TAK1 activation remains elusive. Here, using Trim26-knockout mice and Trim26-transgenic mice, we found that TRIM26 acts as a positive regulator of TAK1 activation by ubiquitinating its binding partner TAB1. Knockout of Trim26 inhibited TAK1 activation and downstream kinases activation, thus decreasing the induction of proinflammatory cytokines following LPS, TNF-alpha, and IL-1 beta stimulation. Mechanistically, TRIM26 catalyzes the K11-linked polyubiquitination of TAB1 at Lys294, Lys319, and Lys335 to enhance the activation of TAK1 and subsequent NF-kappa B and MAPK signaling. Consequently, Trim26 deficiency protects mice from LPS-induced septic shock in vivo. Moreover, Trim26 deficiency attenuates the severity of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced colitis. Thus, these finding provides a novel insight into how TAK1 activation is regulated through TRIM26-mediated ubiquitination of TAB1 and reveals the new function of TRIM26 in the regulation of the inflammatory innate immune response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据