4.8 Article

Expansion of tumor-associated Treg cells upon disruption of a CTLA-4-dependent feedback loop

期刊

CELL
卷 184, 期 15, 页码 3998-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.027

关键词

-

资金

  1. Melanoma Research Foundation
  2. NIH [R01 AI123349, R21 AR072849]
  3. Elizabeth O'Brien/Charles King Trust fellowship
  4. Shakhmardan Yessenov Foundation
  5. Nazarbayev University
  6. Italian Biochemistry Society (SIB)
  7. DFG [PR 1652/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals that T regulatory cells interact with tumor-associated conventional dendritic cells to receive activation signals and self-regulate their function through a CTLA-4- and CD28-dependent feedback loop. CTLA-4 blockade may lead to Treg cell hyper-proliferation and impact therapeutic benefits in cancer patients.
Foxp3(+) T regulatory (Treg) cells promote immunological tumor tolerance, but how their immune-suppressive function is regulated in the tumor microenvironment (TME) remains unknown. Here, we used intravital microscopy to characterize the cellular interactions that provide tumor-infiltrating Treg cells with critical activation signals. We found that the polyclonal Treg cell repertoire is pre-enriched to recognize antigens presented by tumor-associated conventional dendritic cells (cDCs). Unstable cDC contacts sufficed to sustain Treg cell function, whereas T helper cells were activated during stable interactions. Contact instability resulted from CTLA-4-dependent downregulation of co-stimulatory B7-family proteins on cDCs, mediated by Treg cells themselves. CTLA-4-blockade triggered CD28-dependent Treg cell hyper-proliferation in the TME, and concomitant Treg cell inactivation was required to achieve tumor rejection. Therefore, Treg cells self-regulate through a CTLA-4- and CD28-dependent feedback loop that adjusts their population size to the amount of local co-stimulation. Its disruption through CTLA-4-blockade may off-set therapeutic benefits in cancer patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据