4.6 Review

Overview of electrocatalytic treatment of antibiotic pollutants in wastewater

期刊

CATALYSIS REVIEWS-SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
卷 65, 期 2, 页码 569-619

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01614940.2021.1960009

关键词

Electrocatalytic degradation; antibiotics; mechanism; transformation pathways; water treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the common features, synthesis methods, and research progress of electrode materials used in the electrocatalytic process for the treatment of antibiotics in the last five years. The removal mechanism and transformation pathways of antibiotics in the electrocatalytic oxidation and reduction processes are presented, while considering the cost aspect and proposing several developing directions for further research.
Abuse of antibiotics in animal husbandry and medicine has led to severe environmental problems especially the risk of bacterial resistance. Different from common organic pollutants, antibiotics in wastewater could not be easily removed by biological treatment because of their poor biodegradability. Electrocatalysis including electrocatalytic oxidation and reduction has gained great attention for the removal of antibiotic contaminants in wastewater due to its advantages of high efficiency, simple operation, and thorough degradation. This review summarizes the common features and synthesis methods as well as research progress of electrode materials used in the electrocatalytic process for the treatment of antibiotics in the last five years. The removal mechanism and transformation pathways of antibiotics in the electrocatalytic oxidation and reduction processes are presented, especially to avoid the second pollution. Cost aspects in the electrocatalytic process are also discussed by considering practical applications and comparison with adsorption and photocatalysis process. Finally, several developing directions of electrocatalysis in the antibiotic wastewater treatment are proposed as a guidance for further research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据