4.7 Article

Oroxylin A maintains the colonic mucus barrier to reduce disease susceptibility by reconstituting a dietary fiber-deprived gut microbiota

期刊

CANCER LETTERS
卷 515, 期 -, 页码 73-85

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.05.018

关键词

Dietary fiber; Oroxylin A; Mucus layer; Gut microbiota; Eubacterium coprostanoligenes

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81903626, 81872899]
  2. Social Development Project of Jiangsu Provincial Science and Technology Department [BE2018711]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20180576]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2632021ZD03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oroxylin A, a natural flavonoid, has been found to ameliorate low-grade colonic inflammation caused by fiber deficiency and prevent colitis-associated colon cancer by altering gut microbiota, particularly by increasing levels of Eubacterium coprostanoligenes. This suggests a potential therapeutic strategy for intestinal diseases.
Dietary fiber intake helps to maintain gut homeostasis. Fiber deficiency causes commensals to utilize mucins as an energy source to destroy mucus layer, thus promoting susceptibility to inflammatory bowel disease. Here, we reported that oroxylin A, a natural flavonoid, ameliorated low-grade colonic inflammation caused by fiber deficiency, alleviated colitis, and further prevented colitis-associated colon cancer in mice. The antiinflammatory effect of oroxylin A was due to its alteration of gut microbiota. We found that the levels of Eubacterium coprostanoligenes was significantly increased by oroxylin A and the colonized Eubacterium coprostanoligenes significantly protected against colitis and carcinogenesis in colon of mice. Together, our results in this study suggest that oroxylin A may reduce the susceptibility to intestinal diseases by increasing the level of Eubacterium coprostanoligenes which could provide a therapeutic alternation for the treatment of intestinal diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据