4.7 Article

Protopine triggers apoptosis via the intrinsic pathway and regulation of ROS/PI3K/Akt signalling pathway in liver carcinoma

期刊

CANCER CELL INTERNATIONAL
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-021-02105-5

关键词

Protopine; Liver carcinoma; Apoptosis; ROS; PI3K; Akt

类别

资金

  1. Medical and Health Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province [2019KY070, 2019KY380]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ21H16001, LYQ20H310005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that protopine inhibits liver carcinoma cell viability by triggering apoptosis and suppressing the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. In vivo experiments showed that protopine effectively repressed tumor growth without noticeable toxicity, indicating its potential as a therapeutic agent for liver carcinoma.
Background Protopine is an isoquinoline alkaloid that possesses various biological activities including the anti-tumour activity. However, the effects of protopine on liver carcinoma cells are still elusive. The aim of this study is to examine the effects of protopine on liver carcinoma cells both in vitro and in vivo. Methods MTT assay was performed to measure the cell viability. Wound healing and transwell assays were conducted to assess the motility of cells. Cellular apoptosis and ROS levels were measured by the flow cytometry. Western blotting assay was used to measure the change of proteins. The cytotoxicity of protopine was also evaluated in xenograft mice. Results Protopine inhibited viabilities and triggered apoptosis via the intrinsic pathway in a caspase-dependent manner in liver carcinoma cells. Furthermore, protopine also induced accumulation of intracellular ROS which further led to the inhibition of PI3K/Akt signalling pathway. Finally, in vivo study showed that protopine also repressed tumour growth in xenograft mice without noticeable toxicity. Conclusions Protopine might be used as a potential therapeutic agent for the treatment of liver carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据