4.1 Article

Viscous interaction and stability on dark matter Bose-Einstein condensation with modified Chaplygin gas

期刊

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS
卷 99, 期 11, 页码 991-997

出版社

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/cjp-2021-0111

关键词

dark energy; dark matter; Bose-Einstein condensation; modified Chaplygin gas; bulk viscosity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates viscous cosmological dynamics in the presence of dark matter Bose-Einstein condensation by curved-FRW background. By considering an interacting model with modified Chaplygin gas, the energy density and pressure of dark energy are derived, and cosmological parameters versus redshift parameter are found by fitting with supernova data. The study shows that the universe is currently undergoing an accelerated expansion phase, and explores the stability and instability of the present model with the sound speed parameter.
In this paper, viscous cosmological dynamics are studied in the presence of dark matter Bose-Einstein condensation by curved-FRW background. For this purpose, we use the BEC regime rather than normal dark matter (cold dark matter or barotropic dark matter) with the dark matter equation of state as p(dm) proportional to rho(2)(dm), which arises from the gravitational form. Therefore, we obtain the corresponding continuity equations with the existence of the universe components by considering an interacting model with modified Chaplygin gas. Afterward, we derive the energy density and the pressure of dark energy in terms of the redshift parameter. And then, by introducing a parametrization function and fitting it with 51 supernova data with the likelihood analysis, we find the cosmological parameters versus redshift parameter. In what follows, we plot the corresponding dynamic graphs proportional to redshift, and then we represent that the universe is currently undergoing an accelerated expansion phase. Finally, we explore the stability and the instability of the present model with the sound speed parameter.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据