4.4 Article

Centrifuge Studies of Topographic Effects: Parametric Investigation

期刊

出版社

SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1785/0120200354

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [0936543]
  2. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  3. Directorate For Engineering [0936543] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used a geotechnical centrifuge experimental program to investigate topographic effects on single-sided slopes. The results showed that topography modified the frequency content and amplitude of ground motion, leading to significant changes in peak ground accelerations at the slope crest and determining the extent of the topographic zone of influence. The centrifuge proved to be a powerful experimental technique for systematically and repeatedly analyzing topographic effects.
This article presents the results of a comprehensive geotechnical centrifuge experimental program to investigate topographic effects across a series of single-sided slopes. The experimental campaign considered a range of governing factors, including slope inclination and ground-motion amplitude, frequency content, and duration. The testing program was non-destructive, allowing the centrifuge models to be subjected to over 140 different ground motions. Clear evidence of topographic effects, including amplification and deamplification of ground motion, were observed. Topography modified the frequency content and amplitude of the ground motion such that at the slope crest (1) peak ground accelerations ranged from 50% less than to 200% greater than the free-field, and (2) ground-motion mean square frequency shifted by as much as 55%. Higher topographic amplification levels lead to a larger topographic zone of influence, which, on average, spanned a distance equal to the slope height (H) behind and 2H in front of (toward slope) the slope crest. Physical modeling in the centrifuge proved to be a powerful experimental technique for generating empirical data to analyze topographic effects in a systematic and repeatable manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据