4.4 Article

Conjugation of Phenylboronic Acid Moiety through Multistep Organic Transformations on Nanodiamond Surface for an Anticancer Nanodrug for Boron Neutron Capture Therapy

期刊

BULLETIN OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN
卷 94, 期 9, 页码 2302-2312

出版社

CHEMICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1246/bcsj.20210200

关键词

Nanodiamond; Surface modification; Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the use of boronic acid functionalized DNDs as an anticancer agent for BNCT, demonstrating promising results in in vivo experiments by showing accumulation in tumors and efficacy upon neutron irradiation. The scalable and reliable process of introducing phenylboronic acid moiety to polyglycerol modified DNDs make them a potential candidate for BNCT as an anticancer nanodrug.
Detonation nanodiamonds (DNDs) have attracted considerable attention, in particular, in the field of nanomedicine due to their biocompatibility as well as various functionalities imparted by surface modification. Meanwhile, boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is an advanced cancer treatment utilizing nuclear fission reaction of B-10 upon neutron irradiation. Recently, quite a few boron-containing nanoparticles have been investigated to deliver B-10 atoms into cancer tissue selectively and retentively. In this study, we explored boronic acid functionalized DNDs as an anticancer agent for BNCT. Phenylboronic acid (PBA) moiety was introduced to polyglycerol (PG) modified DNDs (DND-PG) through multistep organic transformation, giving percent order of boron atoms. The process is scalable and reliable by simple covalent chemistry and the resulting product is well dispersed, and stable chemically and physically under physiological conditions. In the in vivo experiments, the resulting material was accumulated in the tumor to exert BNCT efficacy upon neutron irradiation. These results demonstrate that the PBA functionalized DNDs are a promising candidate as an anticancer nanodrug for BNCT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据