4.6 Article

Noise reduction method of microseismic signal of water inrush in tunnel based on variational mode method

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10064-021-02291-6

关键词

Water inrush; Noise reduction; Microseismic signal; Variational mode method; Detrended fluctuation analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52025091, U1934218, 52009070, 51991394]
  2. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China [2019JZZY010601, 2019JZZY010428, ZR2020QE289]
  3. opening fund of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology [SKLGP2020K006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an effective method for extracting microseismic signals caused by tunnel water inrush based on the VMD method, identifying effective modes through detrend analysis, solving the problem of noise mixing with signals, and improving the signal extraction ability effectively.
The extraction of effective signals of microseismic event caused by water inrush in tunnels is an important prerequisite for accurate location of event. In this paper, based on the characteristics of the main frequency components of the tunnel water burst signal, the variational modal method (VMD) with good frequency decomposition ability is adopted to effectively extract the high-frequency components of the water inrush signal. The effective modes are identified by the method of detrend analysis, and the modal decomposition number K is determined. At the same time, the boundary between noise and effective signal is determined. The method proposed in this paper solves the problem that noise in some modal components is mixed with effective signals, and further improves the ability of extracting weak high-frequency signals. Through the analysis of case data, the validity of the research results in this paper is verified, and an effective signal extraction method of tunnel water inrush microseismic event based on VMD-DFA principle is formed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据