4.6 Article

BCR-ABL1 transcript doubling time as a predictor for treatment-free remission failure after imatinib discontinuation in chronic myeloid leukaemia in chronic phase

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
卷 196, 期 1, 页码 136-145

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17807

关键词

CML; TKI discontinuation; treatment-free remission; doubling time; IMATINIB

资金

  1. BMS Canada [BMS CA180543]
  2. Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation
  3. BMS
  4. Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that monthly assessment of doubling time can help identify the risk of molecular recurrence in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after discontinuation of imatinib, thereby distinguishing between high-risk and low-risk patients.
The doubling time (DT) of the BCR-ABL1 quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) transcript level reflects the re-growing fraction of leukaemic cells after discontinuation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). The present study analyzed monthly DT within six months after imatinib discontinuation in 131 patients. Monthly DT was calculated as x = ln(2)/K, where x is the DT and K is the fold BCR-ABL1 change from the previous value divided by the number of days between each measurement. The optimal DT value was determined as 12 center dot 75 days at two months using a recursive partitioning method. The patients were stratified into three groups: the high-risk group (DT0, with rapidly proliferating chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) cells; n = 26) showed the lowest molecular relapse-free survival (mRFS) of 7 center dot 7% at 12 months, compared to 53 center dot 6% in the intermediate-risk group (DT >= 12 center dot 75 days, with slowly proliferating CML cells; n = 16) or 90 center dot 0% in the low-risk group (DT <= 0, i.e., without proliferating CML cells; n = 71; P < 0 center dot 001). Monthly assessment of DT helps identify high-risk patients for treatment-free remission failure with an imminent risk of molecular recurrence, and to define low-risk patients who can be spared the frequent monitoring of monthly molecular tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据