4.5 Article

Leveraging genetic data to investigate the effects of interleukin-6 receptor signalling on levels of 40 circulating cytokines

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 88, 期 3, 页码 1373-1378

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15079

关键词

cytokines; inflammation; interleukin 6; interleukin 6 receptor; Mendelian randomization

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation Research Centre of Excellence [RE/18/4/34215]
  2. Imperial College London
  3. National Institute for Health Clinical Lectureship Research at St. George's, University of London [CL-2020-16-001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using genetic variants related studies, it was found that increased IL-6R signaling is associated with reduced levels of various circulating cytokines, revealing the regulatory mechanisms of IL-6R signaling in inflammatory responses.
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) is a circulating cytokine implicated in inflammatory processes. However, the broad effects of IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) signalling on other circulating cytokines is not known. Using summary-level data from genome-wide association studies, we leveraged genetic variants that proxy IL-6R signalling in two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses to investigate effects on levels of 40 circulating cytokines. Increased genetically proxied IL-6R signalling was associated with reduced levels of 10 circulating interleukins, chemokines and growth factors. The significant results include IL-10 (Mendelian randomization estimate -0.306, standard error [SE] 0.093), IL-4 (estimate -0.393, SE 0.1007), eotaxin (estimate -0.510, SE 0.1213) and Fibroblast growth factor (estimate -0.334, SE 0.1005). The findings from this study support the feedback effects of IL-6R signalling on reducing levels of some circulating cytokines and identify compensatory mechanisms that maybe modulating its inflammatory effects. These results provide insight into the mechanisms by which IL-6R signalling may be contributing to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据