4.6 Review

Effects of general anaesthesia during pregnancy on neurocognitive development of the fetus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA
卷 126, 期 6, 页码 1128-1140

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.02.026

关键词

anaesthesia; brain development; fetus; neurocognitive development; pregnancy

资金

  1. European Union [2013-0040]
  2. Great Ormond Street Hospital Charity Fund
  3. Welcome Trust [WT101957]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (ESPRC) [NS/A000027/1]
  5. Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association (OAA) International Grant
  6. European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC) Young Investigator Start-up Grant
  7. Society for Anesthesia and Resuscitation of Belgium (SARB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review evaluated the effects of exposure to general anaesthetics during pregnancy on fetal brain development. Results indicate that anaesthesia impairs learning and memory, and causes neuronal injury. However, translation of these findings to clinical practice is limited by various factors.
Background: The US Food and Drug Administration warned that exposure of pregnant women to general anaesthetics may impair fetal brain development. This review systematically evaluates the evidence underlying this warning. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from inception until April 3, 2020. Preclinical and clinical studies were eligible. Exclusion criteria included case reports, in vitro models, chronic exposures, and exposure only during delivery. Meta-analyses were performed on standardised mean differences. The primary outcome was overall effect on learning/memory. Secondary outcomes included markers of neuronal injury (apoptosis, synapse formation, neurone density, and proliferation) and subgroup analyses. Results: There were 65 preclinical studies included, whereas no clinical studies could be identified. Anaesthesia during pregnancy impaired learning and memory (standardised mean difference -1.16, 95% confidence interval -1.46 to -0.85) and resulted in neuronal injury in all experimental models, irrespective of the anaesthetic drugs and timing in pregnancy. Risk of bias was high in most studies. Rodents were the most frequently used animal species, although their brain development differs significantly from that in humans. In a minority of studies, anaesthesia was combined with surgery. Monitoring and strict control of physiological homeostasis were below preclinical and clinical standards in many studies. The duration and frequency of exposure and anaesthetic doses were often much higher than in clinical routine. Conclusion: Anaesthesia-induced neurotoxicity during pregnancy is a consistent finding in preclinical studies, but translation of these results to the clinical situation is limited by several factors. Clinical observational studies are needed. Prospero registration number: CRD42018115194 Superscript/Subscript Available

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据