4.7 Article

(R1441C) LRRK2 induces the degeneration of SN dopaminergic neurons and alters the expression of genes regulating neuronal survival in a transgenic mouse model

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 275, 期 -, 页码 104-115

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.09.001

关键词

Parkinson's disease; (R1441C) LRRK2; Transgenic mice; Microarray

资金

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC-96-2314-B-182A-104-MY3, 100-2321-B-182-008, 101-2321-B-182-004, 100-2321-B-182-004, 101-2321-B-182-005, 102-2321-B-182-005, 100-2321-B-182-012, 101-2321-B-182A-001, 102-2321-B-182A-001, 100-2314-B-182A-091-MY3]
  2. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPD1B0332, CMRPG361311, CMRPG381161, CMRPG392001, CMRPG3C1501, CMRPD1C0623, CMRPD1C0693, CMRPG391513, CMRPG300161, EMRP1E1641]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutation of leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) is the most common genetic cause of both familial and sporadic Parkinson's disease (PD) cases. Several mutations in LRRK2 gene were reported in PD patients. R1441 is the second most frequent site of LRRK2 mutation. We generated (R1441C) LRRK2 transgenic mice that displayed motor deficits at the age of 16 months. Compared with wild-type mice, 16-month-old (R1441C) LRRK2 mice exhibited a significant reduction in the number of substantia nigra (SN) dopaminergic neurons. To elucidate molecular pathogenic pathways involved in (R1441C) LARK2-induced death of SN dopaminergic neurons, we performed microarray analysis to visualize altered mRNA expressions in the SN of (R1441C) LRRK2 mouse. In the SN of (R1441C) LRRK2 transgenic mouse, the mRNA expression of three genes that promote cell death was upregulated, while the mRNA expression of seven genes that contribute to neurogenesis/neuroprotection was significantly downregulated. Our results suggest that altered expression of these genes involved in regulating neuronal survival may contribute to the pathogenesis of (R1441C) LRRK2-induced PD. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据