4.7 Article

Interictal spikes with and without high-frequency oscillation have different single-neuron correlates

期刊

BRAIN
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 3078-3088

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awab288

关键词

single unit; interictal spikes; high-frequency oscillations; epilepsy; intracranial EEG

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [JA 1725/4-1, KU 4060/1-1]
  2. Berta-OttensteinProgramme, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg
  3. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01GQ1705A]
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) [BCS1724243]
  5. NIH/NINDS [U01 NS113198-01]
  6. Fraunhofer Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that HFO-IEDs and non-HFO-IEDs have different single-unit correlates. Single-unit firing rates are higher in HFO-IEDs compared to non-HFO-IEDs, with a pronounced pre-peak increase in firing in HFO-IEDs. Moreover, most cells exhibit higher rates during HFO-IEDs, suggesting a distinct subset of neurons prefer this IED subtype.
Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are a widely used biomarker in patients with epilepsy but lack specificity. It has been proposed that there are truly epileptogenic and less pathological or even protective IEDs. Recent studies suggest that highly pathological IEDs are characterized by high-frequency oscillations (HFOs). Here, we aimed to dissect these 'HFO-IEDs' at the single-neuron level, hypothesizing that the underlying mechanisms are distinct from 'non-HFO-IEDs'. Analysing hybrid depth electrode recordings from patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, we found that single-unit firing rates were higher in HFO- than in non-HFO-IEDs. HFO-IEDs were characterized by a pronounced pre-peak increase in firing, which coincided with the preferential occurrence of HFOs, whereas in non-HFOIEDs, there was only a mild pre-peak increase followed by a post-peak suppression. Comparing each unit's firing during HFO-IEDs to its baseline activity, we found many neurons with a significant increase during the HFO component or ascending part, but almost none with a decrease. No such imbalance was observed during non-HFO-IEDs. Finally, comparing each unit's firing directly between HFO- and non-HFO-IEDs, we found that most cells had higher rates during HFO-IEDs and, moreover, identified a distinct subset of neurons with a significant preference for this IED subtype. In summary, our study reveals that HFO- and non-HFO-IEDs have different single-unit correlates. In HFO-IEDs, many neurons are moderately activated, and some participate selectively, suggesting that both types of increased firing contribute to highly pathological IEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据