4.6 Article

Is adolescent multiple risk behaviour associated with reduced socioeconomic status in young adulthood and do those with low socioeconomic backgrounds experience greater negative impact? Findings from two UK birth cohort studies

期刊

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11638-3

关键词

Adolescence; Socioeconomic factors; Cohort studies; Inequalities; Multiple risk behaviour

资金

  1. Medical Research Council within the Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Public Health Interventions (DECIPHer)
  2. Cancer Research UK Population Research Postdoctoral Fellowship [C60153/A23895]
  3. Centre for the Development and Evaluation of Complex Interventions for Public Health Improvement (DECIPHer), a UKCRC Public Health Research Centre of Excellence
  4. British Heart Foundation [MR/KO232331/1]
  5. Cancer Research UK [MR/KO232331/1]
  6. Economic and Social Research Council [MR/KO232331/1]
  7. Medical Research Council [MR/KO232331/1]
  8. Welsh Government [MR/KO232331/1]
  9. Wellcome Trust under UK Clinical Research Collaboration [MR/KO232331/1]
  10. UK Medical Research Council [102215/2/13/2]
  11. Wellcome [102215/2/13/2]
  12. MRC [MC_PC_19009] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that adolescent multiple risk behaviors are associated with socioeconomic status in young adulthood, with this association potentially being influenced by early life socioeconomic status variables. Intervening on adolescent multiple risk behaviors could improve later socioeconomic outcomes and impact health outcomes later in life. Evidence of a moderating effect in one cohort but not the other suggests the need for more detailed measures to capture the nuances of contemporary young adult socioeconomic status.
Background Adolescent multiple risk behaviour (MRB) is associated with negative outcomes such as police arrests, unemployment and premature mortality and morbidity. What is unknown is whether MRB is associated with socioeconomic status (SES) in adulthood. We test whether adolescent MRB is associated with socioeconomic status (SES) in young adulthood and whether it is moderated by early life SES variables. Methods Prospective cohort studies; British Cohort Study 1970 (BCS70) and Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), born in 1991-1992, were used and two comparable MRB variables were derived. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between MRB and young adult SES. The moderating effect of three early life SES variables was assessed using logistic regression models with and without interaction parameters. Evidence to support the presence of moderation was determined by likelihood ratio tests <= p = 0.05. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data. Results Adolescents had a median of two risk behaviours in BCS70 and three in ALSPAC. Adolescent MRB was negatively associated with young adult SES (university degree attainment) in BCS70 (OR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.76, 0.86) and ALSPAC (OR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.88). There was a dose response relationship, with each additional risk behaviour resulting in reduced odds of university degree attainment. MRB was associated occupational status at age 34 in BCS70 (OR 0.86 95% CI: 0.82, 0.90). In BCS70, there was evidence that maternal education (p = 0.03), parental occupational status (p = 0.009) and household income (p = 0.03) moderated the effect of adolescent MRB on young adult SES in that the negative effect of MRB is stronger for those with low socioeconomic backgrounds. No evidence of moderation was found in the ALSPAC cohort. Conclusions Adolescence appears to be a critical time in the life course to address risk behaviours, due to the likelihood that behaviours established here may have effects in adulthood. Intervening on adolescent MRB could improve later SES outcomes and thus affect health outcomes later in life. Evidence for a moderation effect in the BCS70 but not ALSPAC suggests that more detailed measures should be investigated to capture the nuance of contemporary young adult SES.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据