4.4 Article

A Japanese case of oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) with PABPN1 c.35G>C; p.Gly12Ala point mutation

期刊

BMC NEUROLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02300-x

关键词

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD); Poly(a) binding protein nuclear 1 (PABPN1); Point mutation; Muscle ultrasound; Asian case

资金

  1. Intramural Research Grant for Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders of NCNP [2-5, 29-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is a late-onset muscular dystrophy commonly caused by the short expansion of a trinucleotide repeat in the PABPN1 gene. This case report describes a 78-year-old woman and her son with OPMD, diagnosed based on physical examination, muscle imaging, and genetic analysis. The presence of a PABPN1 point mutation in this Japanese case suggests a similar causative role in Asians as seen in Europeans.
BackgroundOculopharyngeal muscular dystrophy (OPMD) is a late-onset muscular dystrophy characterised by slowly progressive ptosis, dysphagia, and proximal limb muscle weakness. A common cause of OPMD is the short expansion of a GCG or GCA trinucleotide repeat in PABPN1 gene.Case presentationA 78-year-old woman presented with ptosis and gradually progressive dysphagia. Her son had the same symptoms. A physical examination and muscle imaging (MRI and ultrasound) showed impairment of the tongue, proximal muscles of the upper limbs, and flexor muscles of the lower limbs. Needle-electromyography (EMG) of bulbar and facial muscles revealed a myopathic pattern. Based on the characteristic muscle involvement pattern and needle-EMG findings, we suspected that the patient had OPMD. Gene analysis revealed PABPN1 c.35G>C point mutation, which mimicked the effect of a common causative repeat expansion mutation of OPMD.ConclusionWe herein describe the first reported Japanese case of OPMD with PABPN1 point mutation, suggesting that this mutation is causative in Asians as well as in Europeans, in whom it was originally reported.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据