4.6 Article

Weight shapes the intestinal microbiome in preterm infants: results of a prospective observational study

期刊

BMC MICROBIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02279-y

关键词

Intestinal microbiome; Prematurity; Mode of delivery; Development; Weight

资金

  1. Junior Scientific Master Class of University of Groningen
  2. Gratama Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intestinal microbiome of preterm infants is affected by the mode of delivery and infant weight. As infants gradually increase in weight, a transition in microbiome composition is observed.
Background The intestinal microbiome in preterm infants differs markedly from term infants. It is unclear whether the microbiome develops over time according to infant specific factors. Methods We analysed (clinical) metadata - to identify the main factors influencing the microbiome composition development - and the first meconium and faecal samples til the 4th week via 16 S rRNA amplican sequencing. Results We included 41 infants (gestational age 25-30 weeks; birth weight 430-990 g. Birth via Caesarean section (CS) was associated with placental insufficiency during pregnancy and lower BW. In meconium samples and in samples from weeks 2 and 3 the abundance of Escherichia and Bacteroides (maternal faecal representatives) were associated with vaginal delivery while Staphylococcus (skin microbiome representative) was associated with CS. Secondly, irrespective of the week of sampling or the mode of birth, a transition was observed as children children gradually increased in weight from a microbiome dominated by Staphylococcus (Bacilli) towards a microbiome dominated by Enterobacteriaceae (Gammaproteobacteria). Conclusions Our data show that the mode of delivery affects the meconium microbiome composition. They also suggest that the weight of the infant at the time of sampling is a better predictor for the stage of progression of the intestinal microbiome development/maturation than postconceptional age as it less confounded by various infant-specific factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据