相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Practical issues encountered while determining Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes
Pascal Woaye-Hune et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2020)
Development of a practical outcome measure to account for individual differences in quality-of-life appraisal: the Brief Appraisal Inventory
Bruce D. Rapkin et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2018)
Measurement, ontology, and epistemology: Psychology needs pragmatism-realism
Herve Guyon et al.
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY (2018)
Appraisal assessment in patient-reported outcome research: methods for uncovering the personal context and meaning of quality of life
Carolyn E. Schwartz et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2017)
When global rating of change contradicts observed change: Examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over time
Carolyn E. Schwartz et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2017)
Distinguishing appraisal and personality influences on quality of life in chronic illness: introducing the quality-of-life Appraisal Profile version 2
Bruce D. Rapkin et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2017)
Semantic primes theory may be helpful in designing questionnaires such as to prevent response shift
Antoine Vanier et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Minimal important change (MIC) based on a predictive modeling approach was more precise than MIC based on ROC analysis
Berend Terluin et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2015)
Personomics
Roy C. Ziegelstein
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE (2015)
Minimal Clinically Important Difference Defining What Really Matters to Patients
Anna E. McGlothlin et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2014)
Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures
K. W. Wyrwich et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2013)
ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research
Bryce B. Reeve et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2013)
Guidelines for a graph-theoretic implementation of structural equation modeling
James B. Grace et al.
ECOSPHERE (2012)
Data mining for response shift patterns in multiple sclerosis patients using recursive partitioning tree analysis
Yuelin Li et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2011)
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Patient-reported outcomes to support medical product labeling claims: FDA perspective
Donald L. Patrick et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2007)
Validity of patient-reported health-related quality of life global ratings of change using structural equation modeling
Stacie M. Metz et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2007)
How a well-grounded minimal important difference can enhance transparency of labelling claims and improve interpretation of a patient reported outcome measure
Jan L. Brozek et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2006)
Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes
KW Wyrwich et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2005)
Hi! How are you? Response shift, implicit theories and differing epistemologies
GR Norman
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2003)
Using the standard error of measurement to identify important changes on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire
KW Wyrwich et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2002)
Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research
DE Beaton et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY (2002)
分享论文
