4.4 Article

Classification of PR-positive and PR-negative subtypes in ER-positive and HER2-negative breast cancers based on pathway scores

期刊

BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01297-8

关键词

Estrogen receptor; Progesterone receptor; Pathway activities; LASSO; Growth factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [82002979]
  2. Scientific Research and Development Funds of Peking University People's Hospital [RDY2020-16]
  3. Peking University Medicine Fund of Fostering Young Scholars' Scientific & Technological Innovation
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BMU2020PYB022, BMU2021PYB013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of PR expression in ER+/HER2- breast cancers indicates a worse prognosis and insensitivity to anti-estrogen therapy. Various PR expression statuses in these cancers can be indicative of molecular variation, particularly in relation to the activation of growth factor pathways.
Purpose PR loss in ER+/HER2- breast cancer indicates worse prognosis and insensitivity to anti-estrogen therapy, while the mechanisms of PR loss in ER+/HER2- breast cancer remain unrevealed. Methods In this study, ER+/PR+/HER2- and ER+/PR-/HER2- breast cancer cases from TCGA were used. 1387 pathways were analyzed and used as variables for classifying the two groups with LASSO regression. Results ER+/PR+/HER2- and ER+/PR-/HER2- breast cancer groups can be classified by a combination of 13 pathways using their activity score. Among the 13 pathways, those involving growth factors and ion-channel transporters were most significant in the distinction, followed by pathways involving immune modulation and cell metabolism. Two growth factor pathways, EGF and IGF-1, were deferentially regulated in ER+/PR+/HER2- and ER+/PR-/HER2- groups. Conclusions In conclusion, this study indicated in ER+/HER2- breast cancers the various status of PR expression can be an indication of molecular variation, particularly for the growth factor pathway activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据