4.4 Article

Adherence to the bedside paediatric early warning system (BedsidePEWS) in a pediatric tertiary care hospital

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06809-2

关键词

Monitoring; Resuscitation; Early warning score; Track and trigger system; Deteriorating children; Chronic illness; Acute illness; Pediatric

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to describe adherence to the Bedside Pediatric Early Warning System (BedsidePEWS) escalation protocol in a large tertiary care children's hospital in Italy. Results showed suboptimal compliance with children with chronic health conditions at higher risk of lower compliance. The impact of adherence to predefined response algorithms on patient outcomes should be further explored.
Background The aim of this study is to describe the adherence to the Bedside Pediatric Early Warning System (BedsidePEWS) escalation protocol in children admitted to hospital wards in a large tertiary care children's hospital in Italy. Methods This is a retrospective observational chart review. Data on the frequency and accuracy of BedsidePEWS score calculations, escalation of patient observations, monitoring and medical reviews were recorded. Two research nurses performed weekly visits to the hospital wards to collect data on BedsidePEWS scores, medical reviews, type of monitoring and vital signs recorded. Data were described through means or medians according to the distribution. Inferences were calculated either with Chi-square, Student's t test or Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate (P < 0.05 considered as significant). Results A total of 522 Vital Signs (VS) and score calculations [BedsidePEWS documentation events, (DE)] on 177 patient clinical records were observed from 13 hospital inpatient wards. Frequency of BedsidePEWS DE occurred < 3 times per day in 33 % of the observations. Adherence to the BedsidePEWS documentation frequency according to the hospital protocol was observed in 54 % of all patients; in children with chronic health conditions (CHC) it was significantly lower than children admitted for acute medical conditions (47 % vs. 69 %, P = 0.006). The BedsidePEWS score was correctly calculated and documented in 84 % of the BedsidePEWS DE. Patients in a 0-2 BedsidePEWS score range were all reviewed at least once a day by a physician. Only 50 % of the patients in the 5-6 score range were reviewed within 4 h and 42 % of the patients with a score >= 7 within 2 h. Conclusions Escalation of patient observations, monitoring and medical reviews matching the BedsidePEWS is still suboptimal. Children with CHC are at higher risk of lower compliance. Impact of adherence to predefined response algorithms on patient outcomes should be further explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据