4.4 Article

A critical ethnographic study of discriminatory social practice during clinical practice in emergency medical care

期刊

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06829-y

关键词

Racism; Discrimination; Black students; Work-integrated learning; Micro-aggression; Social Inclusion; Emergency Care; Paramedicine Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This qualitative study examines racial discrimination experiences in the Emergency Medical Care (EMC) field in South Africa post-apartheid. Results showed that EMC students faced discrimination based on race and gender during work-integrated learning. Language barriers intentionally isolated students from patients, hindering their clinical decision-making and potentially impacting patient care.
Background Post-apartheid, South Africa adopted an inclusive education system that was intended to be free of unfair discrimination. This qualitative study examines the experiences and perceptions of racial discrimination between Emergency Medical Care (EMC) students, clinical mentors, and patients within an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) during clinical practice. Understanding the nature of such discrimination is critical for redress. Methods Within the conceptual framework of Critical Race Theory, critical ethnographic methodology explored how discriminatory social practice manifests during clinical practice. Semi-structured interviews enabled thematic analysis. We purposively sampled 13 undergraduate EMC students and 5 Emergency Care (EC) providers. Results EMC student participants reported experiences of racial and gender discrimination during work-integrated learning (WIL) as they were treated differently on the basis of race and gender. Language was used as an intentional barrier to isolate students from the patients during WIL because EC providers would intentionally speak in a language not understood by the student and failed to translate vital medical information about the case. This conduct prevented some students from engaging in clinical decision-making. Conclusions Unfair discrimination within the pre-hospital setting have an impact on the learning opportunities of EMC students. Such practice violates basic human rights and has the potential to negatively affect the clinical management of patients, thus it has the potential to violate patient's rights. This study confirms the existence of discriminatory practices during WIL which is usually unreported. The lack of a structured approach to redress the discrimination causes a lack of inclusivity and unequal access to clinical education in a public clinical platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据