4.5 Article

Mutation analysis of PALB2 gene in French breast cancer families

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 154, 期 3, 页码 463-471

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-015-3625-7

关键词

PALB2; Familial breast cancer; Germline mutations; Genetic testing

类别

资金

  1. Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer [PRE05/DSL, PRE07/DSL, PRE11/NA]
  2. French National Institute of Cancer [INCa No b2008-029/LL-LC]
  3. comprehensive cancer center SiRIC (Site de Recherche Integree sur le Cancer) [INCa-DGOS- 4654]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Several population-based and family-based studies have demonstrated that germline mutations of the PALB2 gene (Partner and Localizer of BRCA2) are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. Distinct mutation frequencies and spectrums have been described depending on the population studied. Here we describe the first complete PALB2 coding sequence screening in the French population. We screened the complete coding sequence and intron-exon boundaries of PALB2, using the EMMA technique, to assess the contribution of pathogenic mutations in a set of 835 familial breast cancer cases and 662 unrelated controls from the French national study GENESIS and the Paul Strauss Cancer Centre, all previously tested negative for BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic mutations. Our analysis revealed the presence of four novel deleterious mutations: c.1186insT, c.1857delT and c.2850delC in three cases, c.3418dupT in one control. In addition, we identified two in-frame insertion/deletion, 19 missense substitutions (two of them predicted as pathogenic), 9 synonymous variants, 28 variants located in introns and 2 in UTRs, as well as frequent variants. Truncating PALB2 mutations were found in 0.36 % of familial breast cancer cases, a frequency lower than the one detected in comparable studies in other populations (0.73-3.40 %). This suggests a small but significant contribution of PALB2 mutations to the breast cancer susceptibility in the French population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据