4.7 Article

Whole genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of six SARS-CoV-2 strains isolated during COVID-19 pandemic in Tunisia, North Africa

期刊

BMC GENOMICS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07870-1

关键词

Whole genome sequencing; SARS-CoV-2; SNPs; Genotype; Tunisia

资金

  1. Tunisian Ministry of High Education and Research
  2. MediLabSecure Project by the European Commission [DEVCO: IFS/2018/402-247]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This preliminary study in Tunisia aimed to understand the molecular epidemiology and genetic variability of SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Through whole genome sequencing of six highly positive samples, it was found that Tunisian sequences clustered into 6 different clades with 3 major genotypes identified based on SNP mutations. Multiple introductions of the virus in Tunisia were indicated, adding new genomic data on SARS-CoV-2 at the international level.
Background In Tunisia a first SARS-CoV-2 confirmed case was reported in March 03, 2020. Since then, an increase of cases number was observed from either imported or local cases. The aim of this preliminary study was to better understand the molecular epidemiology and genetic variability of SARS-CoV-2 viruses circulating in Tunisia and worldwide. Methods Whole genome sequencing was performed using NGS approach on six SARS. CoV-2 highly positive samples detected during the early phase of the outbreak. Results Full genomes sequences of six Tunisian SARS-CoV-2 strains were obtained from imported and locally transmission cases during the COVID-19 outbreak. Reported sequences were non-identical with 0.1% nucleotide divergence rate and clustered into 6 different clades with worldwide sequences. SNPs results favor the distribution of the reported Tunisian sequences into 3 major genotypes. These SNP mutations are critical for diagnosis and vaccine development. Conclusions These results indicate multiple introductions of the virus in Tunisia and add new genomic data on SARS-CoV-2 at the international level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据