4.6 Article

StrongestPath: a Cytoscape application for protein-protein interaction analysis

期刊

BMC BIOINFORMATICS
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-021-04230-4

关键词

Protein-protein interaction network; Signaling network; Pathway reconstruction; Regulatory pathway; Cytoscape App

向作者/读者索取更多资源

StrongestPath is a tool that can analyze protein interaction networks, identify interactions with the highest confidence scores, and expand networks. This application is capable of finding proteins that may play important roles in multiple signaling pathways.
Background: StrongestPath is a Cytoscape 3 application that enables the analysis of interactions between two proteins or groups of proteins in a collection of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network or signaling network databases. When there are different levels of confidence over the interactions, the application is able to process them and identify the cascade of interactions with the highest total confidence score. Given a set of proteins, StrongestPath can extract a set of possible interactions between the input proteins, and expand the network by adding new proteins that have the most interactions with highest total confidence to the current network of proteins. The application can also identify any activating or inhibitory regulatory paths between two distinct sets of transcription factors and target genes. This application can be used on the built-in human and mouse PPI or signaling databases, or any user-provided database for some organism. Results: Our results on 12 signaling pathways from the NetPath database demonstrate that the application can be used for indicating proteins which may play significant roles in a pathway by finding the strongest path(s) in the PPI or signaling network. Conclusion: Easy access to multiple public large databases, generating output in a short time, addressing some key challenges in one platform, and providing a user-friendly graphical interface make StrongestPath an extremely useful application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据