4.2 Article

Exposure to night-time light pollution and risk of prolonged duration of labor: A nationwide cohort study

期刊

BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 87-96

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/birt.12577

关键词

environmental pollution; night-time lighting; obstetrics; pregnancy outcome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A large nationwide cohort study in Austria over an 8-year period found that exposure to high and medium light pollution during night-time is associated with increased odds of prolonged labor and adverse neonatal outcomes. The study suggests that the negative impact of light pollution on obstetric outcomes needs to be re-evaluated to minimize associated health risks.
Background Light pollution (LP) is a ubiquitous environmental agent that affects more than 80% of the world's population. This large nationwide cohort study evaluates whether exposure to LP can influence obstetric outcomes. Methods We analyzed Austrian birth registry data on 717 113 cases between 2008 and 2016 and excluded cases involving day-time delivery, <23 + 0 gestational weeks, and/or birthweight <500 g, induction of labor, elective cesarean, or cases with missing data. The independent variable, that is, degree of night-time LP, was categorized as low (0.174 to <0.688 mcd/m(2)), medium (0.688 to <3 mcd/m(2)), or high (3 to <10 mcd/m(2)). Duration of labor and adverse neonatal outcomes served as outcome measures. Results Cases in regions with high LP (odds ratio [OR], 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.57) and medium LP (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14-1.31) showed increased odds of prolonged labor (P < .0001 each). Newborns born in regions with high LP (OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.16) and medium LP (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.04-1.10) showed increased odds of experiencing adverse outcomes (P < .0001 each). Preterm delivery <28 + 0 weeks was also associated with the degree of LP (P = .04). Conclusions Night-time LP negatively interferes with obstetric outcomes. The perceived influence of LP as an environmental agent needs to be re-evaluated to minimize associated health risks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据