4.8 Article

Highly permselective uric acid detection using kidney cell membrane-functionalized enzymatic biosensors

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113411

关键词

Electrochemical detection; Uric acid biosensor; Kidney cell membrane; Urate transporter 1; Permselectivity; Uric acid oxidase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that the uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) abundant in kidney cell membranes can be utilized to develop a biosensor capable of selectively detecting uric acid.
Abnormal blood uric acid (UA) levels can lead to its crystallization in the joints, consequently resulting in gout. Accurate detection of UA in the blood is imperative for the early diagnosis of gout. However, electrochemical UA biosensors are vulnerable to antioxidants in the blood, limiting accurate UA detection. To address this issue, we focused on the function of uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1), which is selectively permeable to UA. URAT1 is abundant in the kidney cell membrane (KCM). To apply URAT1 to a sensor, we developed a KCM-coated UA biosensor (called the KCM sensor) that could selectively detect UA through URAT1. The KCM coating in the fabricated KCM sensor was verified via scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and confocal microscopy. The KCM sensor enabled the detection of UA in the range of 0-1000 mu M, with a limit of detection of 8.5 mu M, suggesting that it allows the diagnosis of the early stages of gout. On the other hand, the UA permeability of the KCM sensor was significantly reduced in the presence of a URAT1 inhibitor, implying that URAT1 is a key factor for UA detection. The selectivity of the KCM sensor was demonstrated by measuring the amount for UA in the presence of various antioxidants. Finally, the KCM sensor was capable of measuring UA in human serum and was reproducible with 0.5-1.6% deviation. The UA permeability and selectivity of the KCM sensor were maintained even after 3 weeks of storage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据