4.8 Article

Plasmon-enhanced fluorescence correlation spectroscopy for super-localized detection of nanoscale subcellular dynamics

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 184, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2021.113219

关键词

Fluorescence correlation spectroscopy; Plasmonics; Super-localization; Plasmonic nanodimer arrays; Nanogap; Lysosome

资金

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) - Korean Government [2019R1A4A1025958]
  2. Korea Medical Device Development Fund [202011D25]
  3. NRF [2019R1A6A1A03032869]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The report focuses on plasmon-enhanced imaging fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, utilizing nanogap-based plasmonic nanodimer arrays for improved signal-to-noise ratio and precision. The study confirms the enhancement effect of PNAs and investigates lysosomes diffusion dynamics, potentially serving as a powerful analytical tool for exploring subcellular dynamics in the future.
In this report, we investigate plasmon-enhanced imaging fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (p-FCS). p-FCS takes advantage of extreme light confinement by localization at nanogap-based plasmonic nanodimer arrays (PNAs) for enhanced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and improved precision by registration with surface plasmon microscopy images. Theoretical results corroborate the enhancement by PNAs in the far-field. Near-field scanning optical microscopy was used to confirm near-field localization experimentally. Experimental confirmation was also conducted with fluorescent nanobeads. The concept was further applied to studying the diffusion dynamics of lysosomes in HEK293T cells stimulated by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate treatment. It was found that lysosomes demonstrate stronger super-diffusive behavior with relatively weaker sub-diffusion after stimulation. SNR measured of p-FCS was improved by 9.77 times over conventional FCS. This report is expected to serve as the foundation for an enhanced analytical tool to explore subcellular dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据