4.5 Article

Preparation and Properties of Wet-Spun Microcomposite Filaments from Cellulose Nanocrystals and Alginate Using a Microfluidic Device

期刊

BIORESOURCES
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 5780-5793

出版社

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIV DEPT WOOD & PAPER SCI
DOI: 10.15376/biores.16.3.5780-5793

关键词

Cellulose nanocrystal; Alginate; Wet-spinning; Microcomposite filament

资金

  1. National Institute of Forest Science [FP04002016-01]
  2. R&D Program for Forest Science Technology by Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute) [2019151D10-2123-0301]
  3. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2018R1A6A1A03025582]
  4. Korea Forestry Promotion Institute (KOFPI) [2019151D10-2123-0301] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CNCs showed excellent wet-spinnability in CaCl2 solution, and the addition of AL enhanced this property. Increasing AL content led to a decrease in the average diameter of the microcomposite filament, but a deterioration in its tensile properties. Higher spinning rates resulted in improved tensile properties due to increased orientation index of CNCs.
Cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) were wet-spun in a coagulation bath for the fabrication of microfilaments, and the effect of sodium alginate (AL) addition on the wet-spinnability and properties of the microcomposite filament was investigated. The CNC suspension exhibited excellent wet-spinnability in calcium chloride (CaCl2) solution, and the addition of AL in CNC suspension resulted in the enhancement of the wet-spinnability of CNCs. As the AL content increased from 3% to 10%, the average diameter of the microcomposite filament decreased, and its tensile properties deteriorated. The increased spinning rate caused an increase in the orientation index of CNCs, resulting in an improvement in the tensile properties of the microcomposite filament.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据