4.8 Article

Effects of humic acid modified oyster shell addition on lignocellulose degradation and nitrogen transformation during digestate composting

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 329, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124834

关键词

Digestate; Humic acid; Oyster shell; Nitrification; Composting

资金

  1. Transformational Technologies for Clean Energy and Demonstration, Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA 21060400]
  2. Research and Innovation Fund supported by Qingdao Institute of Bioenergy and Bioprocess Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences [QIBEBT I201906]
  3. Heilongjiang R&D Program of Application and Advanced Technology [GA19B202]
  4. General Project - Postdoc foundation (batch 66) [228223]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province [ZR2020ME234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The novel humic acid modified oyster shell (MOS) as a bulking agent showed improved degradation of lignocellulose and reduced abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea during the composting process, leading to decreased N2O emission and enhanced compost maturity.
The aim of this work was to investigate the performance of a novel humic acid modified oyster shell (MOS) bulking agent on the digestate composting. MOS was prepared by immobilizing humic acid onto oyster shell using solid phase grafting method, and then applied to the composting process. Results showed more obvious degradation of lignocellulose was observed in the MOS treatment, which was probably due to the high relative abundance of Actinobacteria. Moreover, the addition of MOS could significantly preserve NH4+ and reduce the NO3? generation with the decreasing abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and archaea. Besides, adding MOS reduced the N2O emission by 59.63% compared with the control. After composting, excitation-emission matrix fluorescence spectra demonstrated that the humification degree as well as compost maturity was enhanced with MOS added.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据