4.8 Article

Effect of changes in continuous carboxylate feeding on the specific production rate of butanol using Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125057

关键词

Butanol fermentation; Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum; Continuous culture; Design of experiments; Multi-feedstock biorefinery

资金

  1. European Regional Development Fund (EFRE)
  2. province of Upper Austria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The variability in substrate in multi-feedstock biorefineries has implications for the stability of downstream bioprocesses, with total acid feed rate and the ratio of butyric acid to acetic acid in the feed found to be significant factors in substrate utilization. To maximize specific butanol production rate, glucose should not be limited and butyric acid should be supplied at a rate of 7.5 mmol L-1 h-1. pH plays a role indirectly in process stability.
Substrate variability in multi-feedstock biorefineries has implications for the stability of downstream bioprocesses. Here, we studied potential effects of fluctuating feed rates and pH on substrate uptake and butanol production by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum during continuous co-feeding with butyric and acetic acid. Monitoring the fermentation extensively and at high frequency, enabled us to perform irregular fraction experimental designs. The total acid feed rate and the ratio of butyric acid to acetic acid in the feed were found to be significant factors in their uptake by the culture. Furthermore, to maximize the specific butanol production rate, glucose may not be limited and butyric acid should be supplied at a rate of 7.5 mmol L-1 h-1. Surprisingly, pH played a role only indirectly, in its effect on process stability. Obtained results facilitate the control of feed rates based on physiological descriptors, which will be a critical factor in the establishment of multi-feedstock biorefineries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据