4.8 Review

Insights into upstream processing of microalgae: A review

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 329, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124870

关键词

Microalgal cultivation; Bioreactors; Culture media; Wastewater treatment; Environmental factors; Upstream processing

资金

  1. Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea [PJ01475801]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [4120200313708] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides insights into the upstream processing of microalgae, discussing important steps such as cultivation modes and photobioreactors design. It also compiles a comprehensive list of bioreactors used, cultivation media composition, wastewater types for microalgal cultivation, and environmental variables studied in microalgae research. Existing challenges and future research needs in microalgae upstream processing are highlighted.
The aim of this review is to provide insights into the upstream processing of microalgae, and to highlight the advantages of each step. This review discusses the most important steps of the upstream processing in microalgae research such as cultivation modes, photobioreactors design, preparation of culture medium, control of environmental factors, supply of microalgae seeds and monitoring of microalgal growth. An extensive list of bioreactors and their working volumes used, elemental composition of some well-known formulated cultivation media, different types of wastewater used for microalgal cultivation and environmental variables studied in microalgae research has been compiled in this review from the vast literature. This review also highlights existing challenges and knowledge gaps in upstream processing of microalgae and future research needs are suggested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据