4.8 Article

Circular utilization of food waste to biochar enhances thermophilic co-digestion performance

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 332, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125130

关键词

Biochar; Food-energy-water nexus; Interspecies electron transfer; Codigestion; Biofilm

资金

  1. USDA [INFEWS/T1: AWD1006334]
  2. Princeton High Meadows Environmental Institute Grand Challenges program
  3. Princeton Center for Complex Materials (PCCM)
  4. National Science Foundation (NSF) Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) [DMR-1420541]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explores the use of biochar derived from food waste as a codigestion amendment for improving biogas production. Results demonstrate that biochar from mixed food waste significantly enhances methane production compared to other biochars and unamended control, indicating the potential of integrating biochar production with codigestion for more sustainable food waste management.
Codigestion is an emerging approach to improve wastewater sludge biogas production and valorize food waste (FW). This study explores FW-derived biochar as a codigestion amendment for the first time and reports a matrix experiment using four diverse biochar amendments (mixed food waste, pinewood, bonechar, unamended control) across four FW types (vegetable, rice, chicken, mixed). It demonstrated that biochar derived from mixed FW can greatly improve the performance of biogas production and yield relative to unamended control and other biochars. The mixed food waste (MFW) biochar amendment led to 34.5%, 35.6%, and 47.5% increase in methane production from mixed FW compared to biochars made of wood, bone and non-amendment control, and the maximum methane production rate of MFW biochar reactors could be up to 6.7?9.9 times of the control. These results suggest that a more circular utilization of FW by integrating biochar production with codigestion can bring great benefits to FW management.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据